Subject	got any more details?
Posted by	Z U N L on June 09, 2004 at 9:45 PM
	This message has been viewed 57 times.
In Reply To	207 (n/m) posted by Chris(NJ) on June 09, 2004 at 09:09 PM
Message	i seem to recall stories of SpdRacr's "Raptor" doing somewhere around that, but it was years ago and my memory sucks. are you referring to that event or something else (such as drag z's like the puerto rican one)? "The two seater is being joined in a few weeks by a larger two-plus-two model with a rear seat for munchkins." ~Jim Mateja, Chicago Tribune, in regards to the Z32. Andrew Janeshek // jnshk@aol.com // 1992 NA 2+2 [Stage 2-ish]
Follow Ups	What's the highest speed documented for the TT? (n/m) - masterclee 20:49:54 06/09/04 warp factor 1.47 (n/m) - robo (sebring1970) 20:55:22 06/09/04 what's the top end on my Z? (n/m) - robo (sebring1970) 22:02:41 06/09/04 t-tops? just guessin =) (n/m) - vorpalZ 22:24:31 06/09/04 .....Engage. Number one, you have the bridge. (n/m) - frogman682 22:32:03 06/09/04 Jorge Lazcano went 190 mph in the 1/4 mile. :-) (n/m) - Arnel(Z32racing.com) 20:58:37 06/09/04 207 (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 21:09:36 06/09/04 got any more details? - Z U N L 21:45:25 06/09/04 no, i was referring to spdracer, err whatever his sn was. (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 05:34:44 06/10/04 His other speedo read 211, but he posted the lower one. (n/m) - thunderZ 21:50:40 06/09/04 Mach III (n/m) - sfpearl300z 21:13:51 06/09/04 Only the SR-71 model though. (n/m) - Marshall 22:02:27 06/09/04 jun's 300zx TT did 246mph at Bonneville (n/m) - Red Baron Z 21:26:06 06/09/04 261mph (n/m) - U ZCREAM 21:31:55 06/09/04 339.62kmh whatever that translates to :p (n/m) - TwinTurboPoweredZ 21:52:16 06/09/04 262.4mph (n/m) - TwinTurboPoweredZ 21:57:40 06/09/04 wait heres a link to it 419.84km/h - TwinTurboPoweredZ 21:55:36 06/09/04 WAY back in 1991 no less :) (n/m) - SeedyROM 22:18:38 06/09/04 YA thats a long time ago;) (n/m) - TwinTurboPoweredZ 23:26:18 06/09/04 ghhhhnh, the engrish is hard on my head - vorpalZ 22:31:22 06/09/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.